[doseta-discuss] suggestions/concerns on spec

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at cloudmark.com
Thu Jun 2 12:13:25 PDT 2011


> -----Original Message-----
> From: doseta-discuss-bounces at blackops.org [mailto:doseta-discuss-bounces at blackops.org] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 12:10 PM
> To: doseta-discuss at trusteddomain.org
> Subject: Re: [doseta-discuss] suggestions/concerns on spec
> 
> DOSETA pulls in public key propagation.  Requires a bh field (you might
> want to sign headers but no body).  I'd like to see that stuff split off
> and/or optional.

That's curious.  Why would you want to sign none of the body?

(I've heard the email side of that argument, but I'm keen to hear new perspectives.)



More information about the doseta-discuss mailing list